These insightful essays are the result of a remarkable dialogue between the two men, sponsored by. The debate compares and evaluates the central ideas of habermas and foucault as they pertain to questions of. The context is the question about the relevance of faith to modern life, an issue which both ratzinger and habermas have been and are engaging carefully. Communal values in the new hungarian fundamental law. Two of the worlds great contemporary thinkers theologian and churchman joseph ratzinger, now pope benedict xvi, and jurgen habermas, philosopher and neomarxist social critic discuss and debate aspects of secularization, and the role of reason and religion in a free society. Religion and democracy in the thought of jurgen habermas. These two separate essays are the summation of a discussion between these two men. Once citizens act in my take on the habermasratzinger debate.
Every week there were reports about another three or four incidents, habermas recalls at his home outside munich. Habermas, the last great representative of the philosophical school of frankfurt and the esteemed counterpart of thencardinal ratzinger in the debate that took place in munich on january 19, 2004, revived the proposal for an alliance between enlightened reason, or the clarified consciousness of modernity, and the. This debate underpins the dialogue in munich, and both ratzinger. The focus of this lecture is the habermas and ratzinger debate in munich. Freire and habermas in terms of the more general problematic of the issues of critical social theory and methodology, especially with respect to habermass critique of the human sciences morrow, 1982, 1983, 1989, 1991, 1994a, 1994b. Habermas, 1981 kleine politische schriften, suhrkamp, frankfurt am main, p.
At the level of the community, it tried to institute the political autonomy of citizens, where law emerges solely from debate among free and. In 2004 jurgen habermas and joseph ratzinger participated on a debate on the prepolitical moral foundations of a freestate. In the most recent publication by pope benedict xvi, which is actually a collection of interviews by peter seewald called light of the world, german philosopher jurgen habermas is mentioned once again. Reason, pluralism, and the claims of political philosophy todd hedrick stanford university press, 2010. The page citations given in parentheses refer to the german edn.
Jurgen habermas, as often happens when he reads the newspaper, was agitated. Feb 15, 2017 habermass fetishising of communication has biographical resonance. Critical commentaries on habermas have often treated the public sphere as a. Thus, adorno was ultimately able to bestow the crown of legitimate succession on the person who he thought was the most deserving and capable critical theorist wiggershaus 1996. Their contributions showed broad agreement on the role of religion in todays western secular state and areas of collaboration and mutual enrichment between modernity and christianity in europe and elsewhere. Linkpage citation modern western civilization, shaped not least by the enlightenment, is the ever present background to ratzingers theological project. Two of the worlds great contemporary thinkerstheologian and churchman joseph ratzinger, now pope benedict xvi, and jrgen habermas, philosopher and neomarxist social criticdiscuss and debate aspects of secularization, and the role of reason and religion in a free society. Oct 23, 2019 debate habermas ratzinger pdf posted on october 23, 2019 by admin the dialectics of secularization. I have talked about the two intellectual giants on a previous post.
For, on one hand, it is true that foucault is as we all must be, particularly 289 king. January 2004 to discuss the topic the prepolitical moral foundations of a free state. And while ratzinger precisely dialogues with habermas because of what he advocates for, making the religious feel at home in the modern state, he will also say that this is inadequate or insufficient. Everyday low prices and free delivery on eligible orders. The analysis of a fascinating habermasratzinger debate on the prepolitical moral foundations of the freestate suggests that while legitimacy originates on the will of the citizens that conform the political community, liberal democracies might not be completely free from moral principles implicit in their political culture. He was born with a cleft palate and had corrective surgery twice during childhood. This short work is their take on the interctions of democratic culture, political liberalism, religion and god. He is aware of the existence of two kinds of secularism. Ratzinger had already used this formulation in books published in 1989 and 1991, well before the cdfs 1992 letter. Once citizens act in my take on the habermas ratzinger debate. In fact, both ratzinger and schuller felt the public debate about the truth of the christian religion had been characterised by more intellectual passion in france. It will be shown that there is something more to it than the individuals defence against the state.
Ratzingers approach to reading genesis, as a particularly noteworthy. This thesis will seek to determine whether habermass theory, called the theory of discourse ethics, is an ethical theory that is appropriate or applicable for use within. The event was widely regarded as a conversation about the topic the prepolitical moral foundations of a liberal state. It is the main thrust of his contribution to the debate in munich, january 2004, with jurgen habermas, one of europes main spokesmen for. The habermasratzinger debate and its implications for europe liberal democracy. Habermas, on the relations between the secular liberal state and religion, and joseph ratzinger, prepolitical. Sep 22, 2015 the author is a former doctoral student of ratzinger s. Jurgen habermas joseph ratzinger, the dialectics of secularization. He was born with a cleft palate and, despite several operations as a small boy, for the rest of his life has spoken with a. Prepolitical foundations of the democratic constitutional. The article investigates the encounter between joseph cardinal ratzinger and jurgen habermas in munich 2004. Teoria critica y estado social neokantismo y socialdemocracia en j. His early work was devoted to the public sphere, to modernization, and to critiques of trends in philosophy and politics.
Aug 15, 2019 debate habermas ratzinger pdf the dialectics of secularization. The habermasratzinger debate and its implications for europe. Habermas has no problem acknowledging an important role for religion in the democratic constitutional state. On reason and religion on free shipping on qualifying offers. The theory of communicative action belongs to the set of modern postmarxist theories. Habermas returned to frankfurt to take over horkheimers chair in philosophy and sociology. Associated with the frankfurt school, habermass work focuses on the foundations of epistemology and social theory, the analysis of advanced capitalism and democracy, the rule of law in a critical socialevolutionary context, albeit within the confines of the natural law tradition, and contemporary politics, particularly german politics.
Because when an exchange as habermas proposes really begins to take plac. The book juxtaposes key texts from foucault and habermas. In both he sees no less than the prototypes of a decisive dialogue in our day which will shape the future of our world p. Habermas and ratzinger on the future of religion michael welker. Jan 29, 2011 sorry i only approved your comment now, and responded so late. He then slowly began to articulate theories of rationality, meaning, and truth. Habermas argues that his speech disability made him think differently about the importance of deep dependence and of communication. Further, our approach is situated in relation to a longstanding and. It was 1992, and rightwing attacks on immigrants and foreign workers, which had begun in the former east germany, were continuing.
Habermas, jurgen internet encyclopedia of philosophy. Habermas, ratzinger and the kantian divide creatio. Ratzinger debate began, as ratzinger notes in a followup article entitled. Habermass fetishising of communication has biographical resonance. The result is a guide for those seeking to understand and build on an unfinished debate between two of the 20th centurys most important philosophers. Habermas and ratzinger now benedict xvi are two of the greatest minds of their times. Habermas warns about external threats to secular society. Feb 19, 2011 i find it significant that habermas speaks about the sensitivity to the truth as a necessary element of the process of political argumentation, reinserting thus the concept of truth into the philosophical debate and into the political debate. On reason and religion joseph ratzinger, jurgen habermas on free shipping on qualifying offers.
Foucault and habermas did not actually debate in person, though they were considering a formal one in the u. Although it does not provide a comprehensive overview of every aspect of habermass critical theory, it does situate the idea of the public sphere, which occupied him early on in his career, in the context of subsequent developments in his thinking. Introduction to christianity, 2nd edition communio books. So we have to concentrate to this tradition as it follows the distinctive signature of habermas in the critical theory of society. Habermas and ratzinger on the future of religion ratzinger is the personi. Habermas, ratzinger and the kantian divide january 29, 2011 january 29, 2011 ricardo s. The same recognition constituted the shared starting point for thencardinal joseph ratzinger and the german political philosopher jurgen habermas in their 2004 debate concerning the moral foundations of the. Lessons from the jurgen habermas and joseph ratzinger debate, fellowship of catholic scholars quarterly, nos. Habermas and ratzinger on the future of religion cambridge core. The human person is the event or being of relativity.
The new concepts of bourgeois formal law made it possible to proceed con. A few phases can be distinguished in his intellectual and scientific development, namely, speculative. The debate was a dialogue between texts and followers. Habermas has put forth a communicativebased alternative to traditional forms of ethics that require recourse to history or tradition or to an authoritative document. Habermas was born in gummersbach, rhine province, in 1929. Habermass modus vivendi between enlightened reason and religious belief in this part of the paper, we look at the habermasratzinger dialogue on the prepolitical moral conditions of the constitution of a free state. Over the last week i have been struggling to understand the basic architecture of german philosopher jurgen habermas, perhaps the most famous philosopher of his generation. Joseph cardinal ratzinger and jurgen habermas met in munich on. Its author is jurgen habermas 1929, the german philosopher and sociologist who pertains to the second generation of the frankfurt philosophical circle. Habermas essay, taking aim at the heart of the present 1984 was altered before release in order to account for foucaults inability to reply. Introduction to christianity, 2nd edition communio books ratzinger, joseph cardinal on. Cardenal ratzinger congreso fides et ratio espana youtube.
421 923 989 365 490 947 991 1086 853 1197 204 248 1192 205 1287 1185 816 584 896 754 549 1440 1090 888 977 509 699